User:Sammm鯊/I'm a fairy tale freak

Wikis
Apparently I was very, VERY, wrong, let's see how many other up for adoption wikis I can find:
 * http://beauty-and-the-beast.wikia.com/wiki/Beauty_and_the_beast_Wiki
 * Cinderella, I actually found the second one on the Oz Wiki cuz the founder wrote a blog about it lmao... The person honestly could have just adopted the first one and make it better imo. xP
 * http://cinderella.wikia.com/wiki/Cinderella_Wiki
 * http://themagicofcinderella.wikia.com/wiki/Cinderella_Wiki
 * The Little Mermaid
 * http://thelittlemermaid.wikia.com/wiki/The_Little_Mermaid_Wiki
 * http://littlemermaid.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page
 * http://peterpan.wikia.com/wiki/Peter_Pan_Wiki
 * http://pinocchio.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page
 * http://princessandthefrog.wikia.com/wiki/The_Princess_And_The_Frog_Wiki
 * http://rapunzel.wikia.com/wiki/Rapunzel_Wiki
 * http://sleepingbeauty.wikia.com/wiki/Sleeping_Beauty_Wiki
 * http://snowwhite.wikia.com/wiki/Snow_white_Wiki
 * The Snow Queen, all in pretty bad shape. I mean, the first and last one may have the looks; but content-wise they are all pretty awful.
 * http://thesnowqueen.wikia.com/wiki/The_Snow_Queen_Wiki
 * http://the-snow-queen.wikia.com/wiki/The_Snow_Queen_Wiki
 * http://snowqueen.wikia.com/wiki/The_Snow_Queen_Wiki
 * http://treasureisland.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page

Playground
For the main page testing area, I actually suggest testing the layout on another actual wiki's main page; because even though the codes work, the format is still different with regular pages and the main page; out of all the inactive-ish wikis I've scouted above; I think Sleeping Beauty Wiki is probably the most suitable to test on, having a relatively darker theme and all; Snow White comes close, but the actual display theme they are using (Jade) would def. clash with what you are going for. So yeah, it's just a thought. Cuz the actual tweaking you're doing is about layouts; so as long as the wiki you test on has images, theirs can be use to substituting; the footers and flagcounter template are just being placed there; it's not actually a part of something you can modify, so those aren't issues.-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 18:13, June 10, 2015 (UTC)


 * Yo KR! Before I start preparing to go out, just want to let you know I also literally only just found this lmao: The Snow Queen Wiki; I would say the dark theme of it runs neck and neck with SB but is probably even darker ahaha; the downside is that this wiki is literally CRAP; I can't believe they used the logo of and not even having a page for it! But yeah, with that one, you won't be able to have a variation of substitute images; but it is still a perfect playground since it's seemingly more abandoned lmao.-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 19:07, June 10, 2015 (UTC)


 * I take that back, I found something as equally worse, this one has 0 article pages at all and the founder made 0 edits thus far; it was set up on March 16, 2015... It IS relatively new, I'll give it that (PPW was set up back in 2007 or 08 or 09 I think, and IT didn't go too well anyways), but it's basically open to play with as well, just thought you should know hahaha! And I also found this, which is honestly quite confusing cuz I don't know why I'm seeing Thor on the main page lmao. But yeah, this one you'll have more to play with cuz it at least got a selection of images. Just disregard what's written on the main page; that's completely bull crap and if it were true, they should have just locked the pages. The admin's last edit was back in 2011, so this one's up for adoption aka mess around with it all you want xP-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 19:57, June 10, 2015 (UTC)


 * Lastly, I finally found a Beauty and the Beast Wiki! YES, can I just say YESSSS? Finally found one! I was so pissed that I kept getting that CW tv show! How dare they also take on the link of the actual story! lol It also has little to nothing, but because there's a supposed upcoming film adaptation, AND the fact Belle likes to read books; this is a place to consider as well!-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 20:15, June 10, 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes! Belle is my favorite Disney princess (besides Princess Mononoke lol.)My family say that I could be her because of my obsession with books and problem with breaking into song and random moments. :) I also sort of look like her, just less perfect... So, yeah, sounds cool! Katherine Rebekah (talk) 23:47, June 18, 2015 (UTC)


 * Not sure if I've shared this with you, but Belle is also my all-time favorite Disney princess! I said "all-time", because when Tangled and The Princess and the Frog first came out, I did for a while feel that Rapunzel and Tiana replaced Belle in my heart.... lol but in the end, it's still different cuz I've known BatB since I was a kid, and the other two films as of now did not leave a stronger long-lasting impact comparing to the ones I've grown up watching xP But yeah, you can even see my convo here with Ohmystars: Thread:5826 hahaha. Anyways, if you ever feel like you're up to it, we can work with the BatBW so that we got to it before the release of the live-action film lmao. This is actually again a tale I don't know much adaptations of; I mean, I know Disney itself has a lota stuff relating to it (I've watched a live-action tv series of it when I was young and remembered liking it!!), and there's also Beastly the book and its film adaptation.... but that's kind of it hahaha.-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 00:01, June 20, 2015 (UTC)


 * Cool! Same favorite Disney princess. You know, I never think that her #1 spot was threatened by anyone but possibly Merida and for the exact same reason, you can't beat nostalgia. Katherine Rebekah (talk) 00:38, June 20, 2015 (UTC)


 * I keep on forgetting what I've shared and what I haven't; I actually really disliked, borderline hating, Brave for a really long time, until I saw Frozen and the latter became what I loathed the most lmao I did not appreciate Merida's attitude towards her mother (I love my entire family and I respect my parents dearly so I can't stand ungrateful kids haha); it reminds me of Finding Nemo, another movie I very much DID NOT LIKE xP.-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 01:22, June 20, 2015 (UTC)


 * I understand where you are coming from, I have a great relationship with my parents too. I liked that the story focused more on her relationship with her mother rather then with a love interest though. Oh my goodness I'm not the only one! For some reason Finding Nemo annoys me so much. I can't pin point why, but it literally drives me crazy when little kids call a clown fish Nemo. Like, no, it's a clown fish. Katherine Rebekah (talk) 19:12, June 20, 2015 (UTC)


 * I do feel like the only thing that was remotely refreshing about Brave was that it was about a princess and sans romance, AND the characters' charming accents, but that's about it for me. I didn't like Finding Nemo just like how I didn't like Merida's ungratefulness to wards her mother, I utterly loathe Nemo's attitude towards his father. He was such a prat!-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 23:22, June 20, 2015 (UTC)

Whelp, apparently Wikia closed the SQ wiki you picked as a playground, so if you ever still feel like playing around with main page layout, you'd have to choose another one; or just use w:c:corneliafunke:Portal:Inkworld Trilogy for the time being. -- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 15:37, December 9, 2015 (UTC)

Peter Pan
BTW, a completely different topic but a real quick question: Do you like (as in actually enjoy, somewhat passionate about and not just "oh, it's alright, don't really care for it") Peter Pan? Not the character but the whole thing. If the answer is no, than the convo stops here xP. -- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 18:03, May 13, 2015 (UTC)


 * Hum, Peter Pan. I have seen the movie several times along with the stage play (though I haven't seen it live) but never read the book. It's on my bucket list along with a lot more classics. Unfortunately, I can't really say that I am passionate about it. I like the story and I especially like how it explores childhood and growing up and just how much we should cling to our innocence. Wendy is my favorite character and I always found it sad that she leaves Never Land. For me the story has always been more bitter then sweet because I'm one of those people who wish that I could live in my childhood fantasies forever. Peter Pan always reminds me that there was once a time when the world was magical and wonderful and that at any second I might find a portal to Narnia. It reminds me that that time is long gone and I may never feel that way again. Maybe that's why I'm not a fan. It just saddens me too much. That was a long answer but anyways, I'm intrigued, why are you asking about Pan? Katherine Rebekah (talk) 18:39, May 13, 2015 (UTC)


 * Ahh.... okay... I guess this is way better than "Why would I be interested in Peter Pan?" lmao... So... it's about Peter Pan Wiki... Such a waste! I mean, how often do you get a wiki about a fairy tale that has so many adaptations? Alice's Adventure in Wonderland and Oz are taken and too big to steer direction; this one on the other hand, is considerably easy to mold to ones liking... I don't even like the original story that much (the fact that Peter Pan was hinted to end up with Wendy's daughter bugged me lmao) but I really do see the potential. I would like to have someone to work with there and treat it as a playground of sorts (gets beaten by true-fans) Like I wrote on a recent edit there, I think the wiki can and should be treated like how it is done on Marvel and DC wikis, different adaptations of the same characters gets their own pages. Man, the wiki could grow large. And just thinking about the upcoming Pan movie, if we get our hands on this wiki, it can go big, and the worst case is it stays the way it is, can't be worse =P -- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 18:50, May 13, 2015 (UTC)


 * Yeah that wiki is looking abysmal and it really is a waste. Unfortunately, like I said, I'm not a true, passionate fan and I already have a lot on my plate with this wiki and my crazy life. If you chose to adopt it though I can tell you I will support you and help out every once in awhile when you need it. Katherine Rebekah (talk) 19:04, May 13, 2015 (UTC)


 * Oh no, I'm not a true-fan myself, and honestly, if the wiki landed in the hands of a non-true-fan, the true-fans are the only ones to blame xDDD Why let something you love rot? I was hoping to find (basically you) someone who's skilled at categorizing and at least don't hate the story so we can, like I said... play around there. All we need to do is creating a bunch of pages and link them together than viola! The rest, if some true-fan finally have some conscious, they'll handle it.-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 19:13, May 13, 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm game if you are. :D Katherine Rebekah (talk) 19:15, May 13, 2015 (UTC)


 * Sweet, by "seen the movie several times", do you mean the Disney version? (And what stage play? o___O?) I think what you can do is, whatever version it is that you're most familiar with, stick with it, and create a character page in that version once in a while name it like: Character Name (What adaptation); chances are, description of that version already existed on the character page (they mostly contain ALL adaptation), and just remove it from the page onto the new one. Do you watch Once Upon A Time? I did at one point but didn't continue, I think that's the easiest one to take care of and if separate might do some good. I didn't watch when the character got involved, but like I said, don't need to be a fan to categorize stuff, if you're okay I'll work on that adaptation.-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 20:00, May 13, 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, I meant the Disney version, however I haven't seen it in like years. So I don't know how that is going to play out... As for the stage play it is this one:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJFtCfHDFfw&safe=active. Peter is played by a grown woman which is kinda awkward, but I'm pretty sure it's a very popular version, or at least was when it first came out.


 * Okay, I think I see what you saying though I might have to ask for help when I actually get around to it. They Disney version is the one I am most familiar with so I'll do that one.Katherine Rebekah (talk) 02:17, May 14, 2015 (UTC)


 * Gah, I'm like kinda super annoyed cuz outa nowhere suddenly there's this person editing on the PPW (let's just abbr. to that)! I've been keeping tabs of it for months and was positive NOBODY cared, and this chick (somehow I just feel it's a girl lol) shows up and is super impressive... (well, her edit count on her other wikis at least)... Hope our not even yet to be playground could still be open to play with lmao.-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 02:32, May 14, 2015 (UTC)


 * Well if she is a true fan and really wants to own that wiki she may not like some of our ideas, specifically linking up pages. It depends on if it bothers her. If if does we might try another wiki. Like Snow White has a lot of adaptations.


 * I'm going to warn you that if I do this my content is not going to be extensive. I'm mainly more worried about, like you said, linking up pages and seeing how that works rather then adding a bunch of content. I will probably only over the basics like personality and looks if that is okay with you. Katherine Rebekah (talk) 15:44, May 14, 2015 (UTC)


 * On the contrary, I actually think a true-fan would appreciate what we'd be doing... just that it takes time to get used to. I know I sure dislike it when the info about adaptation overpowers the original works, and that's happening on the PPW. And don't worry about the content, I DO NOT plan to do extra research for THAT WIKI lmao. Really just about organizing stuff.-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 19:33, May 14, 2015 (UTC)


 * Okay, we're good to go then. Katherine Rebekah (talk) 22:45, May 14, 2015 (UTC)


 * Yo, check out PPW now xDDD Talking to the Wikia staff was surprisingly easy! I was actually betting they'd tell me to adopt the wiki to make the change! Now it at least doesn't look like it was only created for 7 days instead of 7 years lmao.-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 16:26, May 15, 2015 (UTC)


 * Yeah, it's looking good! I guess I'll go ahead and join. Katherine Rebekah (talk) 13:30, May 18, 2015 (UTC)


 * Cool! Page name examples: Peter Pan (Disney character), Captain Hook (Disney), Wendy Darling (Disney), and Tinker Bell (Disney character). Peter Pan and Tinker Bell is slightly different because Disney also released films using their names; with other characters, labeling "(Disney)" should be just fine.-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 22:56, May 18, 2015 (UTC)

It's starting to get a little bit clustered so let's restart from having no indents xP. KR, I hope you do remember this whole thing? xDDD IDK if this is another one of those cases where you thought I was asking you to do something far more difficult than what was actually asked; I think I've created all the pages for characters' counterparts in OUaT, those pages literally only takes less than a minute to make: e.g.: John Darling (Once Upon a Time), Michael Darling (Once Upon a Time), and Smee (Once Upon a Time); really looking forward to seeing those Disney versions! All you have to do is create pages with titles I previously told you, add a stub template, have the see also section link to respective pages on the Disney Wiki, and then go back to the original character page to take out the adaptation category it previously included (in your case, remove "Peter Pan characters" from character pages if they have it).-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 22:21, May 30, 2015 (UTC)


 * Nope, haven't forgotten, and nope don't think it's hard. Just been busy and working on other stuff, but thanks for the reminder. I will be back on full swing on Monday, so I will probably do some pages then, if that sounds good. :) Katherine Rebekah (talk) 00:20, May 31, 2015 (UTC)


 * Okay cool, just wanted to make sure it wasn't the situation I mentioned xD yeah Monday sounds fine! I'll probably start on creating adaptation pages for 2003 film versions, and when those are done, move to the next one (haven't decided which one yet). When there's more than two of the same character pages of different adaptations I can start doing what Marvel and DC wikis are doing with character pages. I think when those steps are done, by then the wiki should look far less like something to be embarrassed about... at least I hope so lmao. xDDD -- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 01:30, May 31, 2015 (UTC)


 * Yerp. I would do it tomorrow as I usually have Sunday afternoons to myself, but there is a big summer kick of thing at my church in the afternoon, and it's kinda mandatory attendance for me. XD Man have I been busy lately! Had the whole church conference thing, then we had to build a chicken coop, and toady we were out at a graduation for most of the day, then more chicken coop building. We finally got the thing done, thank God. Sorry, I know that was off topic, just felt like explainin'.


 * Anyways, wiki stuff I'll get to it on Monday. Hopfully I'll have time to do school work and laundry. Our hose is a reck too, so I should probably clean it. And then there is that show I wanted to watch... XD But seriously, it is on my to do list. Katherine Rebekah (talk) 02:12, May 31, 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm going to feel like a dummy for asking you think but, how do you link up pages on the PPW again? I know you explained it but I can't find the place where you told me. Sorry. Katherine Rebekah (talk) 00:22, June 3, 2015 (UTC)


 * Also, I was wondering if you might consider adding the heading to the character pages even if there is no content, just so that we (mainly I) can remember which ones you want and what order they are to going in and add content as we go along. Katherine Rebekah (talk) 00:27, June 3, 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry to admit I'm actually not understanding what you are asking? Orz There's NO LINKS set up for WHAT YOU HAVE TO CREATE, if that's what you are asking? (I'm honestly confused o___O sorry) There's no such place because as of now, excluding Peter Pan, all the other characters only have two articles for the original and the OUaT counterparts, there's literally little sense of creating those portal-ish pages when there's only two versions around. That's why I said once you do the Disney version, making the next step will then make sense. As for headings, for the pages I took care of, I can go back to do that after I finish working on the 2003 versions. Right now having the pages actually existing was the point, but adding the heading isn't much work so I can do that. Yours won't really have the same problem because the Disney version is mentioned pretty much on all the character pages, so yours probably won't end up being as bare as the ones I created.-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 01:19, June 3, 2015 (UTC)


 * I didn't realize you took the first step and created Peter's page, since wikia was down for a period of time today, idk if that's the reason why the page looks very incomplete; I've moved all the stuff from the character's page to where they now belong, just remember to do that for the next characters and so on =] and REMEMBER, only Peter Pan and Tinker Bell are the exceptions, for the rest they should only just be (Disney) at the and of their names for the title of their article pages; don't do it wrong cuz with no admins around, we can't redo a wrongly named page and can only rename it but the unnecessary redirect will still be there, so be sure to keep this in mind-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 04:59, June 3, 2015 (UTC)


 * I actually just found the information I needed so don't worry about it, sorry if I confused you. Why was the page so short? Because I thought you said it didn't need much content, just to make it. I took a look over that the PPW and I saw that pyogothnerd is doing a pretty good job. Okay, maybe s/he doesn't know a lot of things, but s/he seems more pashonet about it then me. Have you given pyo all the information you have given me? Because I think the bast bet would be to train him/her to be the admin over there. Katherine Rebekah (talk) 14:25, June 5, 2015 (UTC)


 * KR, you have take the time and read what I wrote THOROUGHLY, this is exactly what I wrote:
 * "All you have to do is create pages with titles I previously told you, add a stub template, have the see also section link to respective pages on the Disney Wiki, and then go back to the original character page to take out the adaptation category it previously included (in your case, remove 'Peter Pan characters' from character pages if they have it)."
 * BUT, I am also I'm fault, because I didn't count on you NOT CHECKING editing summaries; when I was creating those pages and then going pack to edit, I always put "removing descriptions about adaptation counterparts, removed them to respective pages." So my bad that the message didn't pass on to you Orz In my defense... I actually did also write:
 * "I think what you can do is, whatever version it is that you're most familiar with, stick with it, and create a character page in that version once in a while name it like: Character Name (What adaptation); chances are, description of that version already existed on the character page (they mostly contain ALL adaptation), and just remove it from the page onto the new one ."
 * I'm sorry for not repeating this the second time I brought up what to be done.... The OUaT pages I gave you as examples didn't have much stuff because their original counterparts didn't mention any thing about their OUaT versions, but if you look at OUaT counterparts of Pan, Hook, Wendy they do have relatively lots of content. Hopefully now it's clear? In case you want to continue to do it! xDD


 * And yeah, PGN is surprisingly super flexible! I was honestly scared cuz you never know how well or bad people takes things when there's different approaches, but she's civil and on broad so good for us :3 And yes, she does seem super passionate than both of us (probably even more than both of us combined lmao). I don't think we have to "train" her at all cuz I think she already has admin experiences (heading quite a few wikis) and what she is doing in, what all of us is doing, actually, doesn't need admin rights; I feel that if/when she feels like taking the full responsibility, she can request for adoption on her own decision, since I did blatantly put the link and statement on the main page that the wiki is open for adoption; I don't think we have to prompt her to go for it =] -- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 21:34, June 5, 2015 (UTC)


 * Sammm, don't misunderstand me. I DO read what you write THOROUGHLY. The problem is that I just forget about two days afterwards. XD Sorry. Everything you said is duly noted. Though, like I said, with what's going on now, I will priorities this wiki rather then PPW.


 * Good to hear! I think your right in say she is way more into it then us. I think the wiki is in good hands. Katherine Rebekah (talk) 22:23, June 5, 2015 (UTC)


 * Okay cool! I just want to make sure what is the cause of it (cuz I'd hated if it were miscommunication!) It's good to know you do read stuff carefully (sometimes I'm afraid I don't! Not a good reader at all! and I know I suck at writing and they all seems sooooo long which is why I felt like making sure, cuz I have to remind myself that from time to time)! So yeah, that's why I also say I'm also responsible for it because I did figure it was perhaps because I didn't re-emphasize it the second time round and that's why you forgot about it, since the talk was indeed quite a while ago.-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 23:35, June 5, 2015 (UTC)
 * Heyyyy Just wanted u to know PPW actually also got featured on Wikia's home page yesterday lmao I screenshot-ed it for celebration lmao. Again if you ever feel like changing scenery briefly, the Disney counterparts still need to be created eventually, so there's always that! I think PGN doesn't particularly care for those versions, she's more set on making the original character pages less bias towards any adaptation (which is why she's started to create those portal pages but not necessarily doing the actual info separation)-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 17:35, June 9, 2015 (UTC)


 * Sweetness! I guess your activity on there spiked things a bit. :D Okay, well I'll keep it in mind (still on my to do list), but probably won't do anything on PPW for awhile. I've actually even been slacking on this wiki and goofing off on the Avatar wiki instead *slaps hand* Big no no. XD The thing is, this is the first wiki I have ever had to do work on, so now I have to drag myself sometimes. lol. Katherine Rebekah (talk) 18:11, June 9, 2015 (UTC)

Oz
Hey KR! Just curious, what's your opinion on Oz? xDDD I think I've told you I've actually only read the first book and DID NOT like it all that much, but I do think its world has the potential to be super intriguing. Anyways, like what I said in the section down below, I thought certain two wikis were too large to steer direction at this point, but it turns out both AAiW and Oz wikis are actually up for adoption; I turned down the recommendation in doing so for AAiW, as I just don't have the passion for it anymore, and luckily, a staff approved what I pitched and made the adjustments to the said wiki; Oz Wiki on the other hand, remains a gigantic mess.

The idea of adopting the Oz Wiki was inconceivable for me because unlike AAiW, I was never remotely enthusiastic about Oz to begin with, and the fact that the wiki is so large and actually has active editors. However, after glancing what had been uploaded to the said wiki, I realized it has a great problem of duplicate images. Sadly, I've taken this situation to the VSTF Wiki, hoping they will help removing those intentionally-uploaded duplicate images, but it doesn't seem to be getting done any time soon; so I thought, well, I will continue to filter through images and mark candidate for deletion when I see duplicates; and when I'm there for a week, I might as well file for adoption and see how that goes.

But yeah, since that wiki actually has active editors (although they don't seem to interact with each other), if and when I do apply for adoption, a public statement will be required; I know this is kinda like asking in favors and could feel like bribery if looking at it the wrong way, but if and when it comes to that, will you be okay to drop in and show a little support? (you'll have to have already joined the wiki for it to count) I just want to be clear, unlike this wiki, where I also initially said I have no intention of keeping the admin position, for Oz, I think if I do manage to convince the staff and be granted the rights, the first thing I'll do is to set up a position like one on OUaT Wiki, an image moderator, and do just that. So yeah, I'm definitely not jumping to a bigger wiki and abandoning this one. And it's not me loosing or switching interests... it's just me can't help being super annoyed when seeing unorganized stuff and... put it bluntly, a pile of crap sitting there.-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 23:06, May 30, 2015 (UTC)


 * Lol. Piles of crap sitting around bother me too. XD Like I've said before hands are full with this wiki, but support? I'm there. :) I think it's safe to say that you and I are friends now and I would be more then happy to help out a friend. So just tell me what you need when you need it, as long as it's not super complicated I'll do it.


 * As far as if I like Oz? I don't really know what to tell you. I've never read the book, the movie was okay, but as a little girl I watched The Wizard of Oz over and over and over. So I love (or used to love) that rendition of the tale. So I might be able to add content wise when it comes to that movie (though it's been a long time and I may not remember some things). Katherine Rebekah (talk) 00:20, May 31, 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, def. friends! :3 xoxo Thanks for everything you just wrote (super heartwarming) I'll let you know when the time comes.


 * I remember watching the film when I was young... but when I went back to it again (because I picked the book to do a report on, and wanted to compare adaptation), I actually fell asleep while watching it lol. The film Return to Oz, however, I still thoroughly enjoy after re-watching it, now if only I could just get a HD copy! (seriously, what I'm able to find are all super low-res!) That movie actually made me consider giving the books it's based on a chance (The Marvelous Land of Oz and Ozma of Oz, the 2nd and 3rd books of the canon series)


 * Anyways... actual content-wise on that wiki is so far down on my to-do list lmao... Right now I'm just set on marking those pile of dung to be rid of hahahaha.-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 01:30, May 31, 2015 (UTC)


 * Aww. Dat's too tweet. XD I love that emoji. :3 You should not have introduced me to it because every time I find a new one I like I way overuse it. lol. :3 (told you)


 * Funny story coming up. When I was say five or six I was watching The Wizard of Oz in the room with my grandma. It was the scene where the Wicked Witch of the West set fire to the scarecrow. (To fully enjoy the next part of the story you must understand I was an angelic child. I hardly ever disobeyed and I was, according to all who can testify, very sweet.) Anyways, my grandma is watching me and she says I got visibly angry with the Witch, like red in the face and everything. And suddenly I burst out, "If I was there I would... I would punch that damn witch!" She said that she wanted to correct me but couldn't because she was laughing too hard. Hope you find that story as amusing as I do. XD


 * Oh good *sigh of relief* I didn't want to add content anyways. If I do it will be very very minor, probably just fixing other peoples mistakes. Cleaning up the crap sounds good to me! Katherine Rebekah (talk) 02:12, May 31, 2015 (UTC)


 * Feel free to use it constantly :3 And ahaha, the story is awesome! You made me smile! =D The Oz wiki is really ridiculous though... I've marked 200+ images for deletion so far... had this user ever dare to pull that crap here, s/he'd be banned the seconded time they did it.-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 22:57, June 1, 2015 (UTC)
 * Glad to hear it. :) Yes, they would totally get blocked. That is ridiculous.Katherine Rebekah (talk) 16:39, June 2, 2015 (UTC)


 * I stupidly realized, if counting today (I have yet started on marking yet), I've actually been on the Oz Wiki for a solid 6 days now. I'm never exactly sure if the whole "adoption rule - have to be on the wiki for a week" is during the application, or file the application when you where there for a week; I know when I filed for this one, I haven't been here for a week and it was knowingly filed early. After the one-week mark, I actually had to wait for an additional few days to get the rights. I have no idea if this time qualifying the one-week thing beforehand would help make the process faster, or still having to go through the same thing, but just in case, it's probably a good idea for you to drop in today or tomorrow; you don't really have to do anything, in fact, I think you can even just post a reply to my post ahaha (that's how I joined, didn't know it then) like asking if the person still intended to adopt the wiki cuz the wiki seriously needs help or something lmao. I know when I file the adoption (I estimate I'll do that on Thursday) I will reply to that post myself to personally inform him/her... cuz honestly, the fact that I got no responds back is not a good sign from a supposed adopter, so I'm making sure to not do the same thing and be reachable as I can.-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 22:11, June 2, 2015 (UTC)


 * Joined. :D Katherine Rebekah (talk) 00:08, June 3, 2015 (UTC)


 * I think you'll have to show some kind of "participation" for your say to actually count... which was why I said to join via leaving a comment... cuz I don't think simply creating a user profile counts as contributing (not in content-wise but community-wise)... if that makes any sense? Like I didn't even set up my profile there but because I left a comment, I'm considered joined.-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 01:19, June 3, 2015 (UTC)


 * This was around he time when the wiki was acting funny. I tried to comment, believe me, but it wasn't working so I just made a user page. That's how I join most wikis anyways and yeh it's not really contributing, but it gets your foot in the door at least. Anything else simple that you need over there, tell me. Katherine Rebekah (talk) 14:25, June 5, 2015 (UTC)


 * It's fine, yeah during the time the entire Wikia was down so it's okay, but now it's probably good for you to comment to show you what you feel about the wiki's situation (those duplicate images!) =] -- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 22:15, June 5, 2015 (UTC)


 * Consider it done. Katherine Rebekah (talk) 22:23, June 5, 2015 (UTC)

The Little Mermaid
That wiki is seriously AWEFUL. Why would someone make a wiki and do nothing with it? Anyways, not really saying we should do something, just saying... Katherine Rebekah (talk) 19:18, May 13, 2015 (UTC)

Hey look I found some cars fanfic! http://thelittlemermaid.wikia.com/wiki/Super_Spies Like, seriously, why is this happening? o_0 Katherine Rebekah (talk) 19:22, May 13, 2015 (UTC)


 * I think ALL of the wikis I've found are terrible; I thought the Peter Pan one was bad... but WTH is up with all those others lmao. The one that really surprised me was the Snow White one... Thought it will blow up everywhere... I guess it makes sense that it didn't cuz one of the, imo idk-why-it-was-even-made movie has its own wiki, but still. And there's Cinderella... That also has a gazilian adaptations... That is probably what I would want to get my hands on the most, but the Peter Pan one has more stuff already there to work with so. -- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 19:34, May 13, 2015 (UTC)


 * You know if we did TLM wiki instead of PP wiki it would probably work out. There are less adaptations but we only need a few. I mean Inkheart only has two and that's really what we are trying to test for, so that's an option. Katherine Rebekah (talk) 15:44, May 14, 2015 (UTC)


 * Oh, PPW is actually NOT a random choice, if it were base on catering to my fairy tale freak tendencies, I would not have picked it to start working on; it's actually because Peter Pan, more accurately, Tinker Bell has been featured in Inkheart; the wiki thus make a good candidate of affiliation, and I would NOT want to affiliate with a poorly managed wiki. The other obvious choices are LotR, AAiW, and Oz; the first one can be ruled out as although it'd be awesome, I don't think they'd care to affiliate with us; the latter two need some serious work, but like I said in the beginning, they already have a somewhat large community, kinda hard to change the game plan at this point, so that leaves Peter Pan. It wasn't really about the balance of two versions, more like practicing other stuff, layouts and formats etc. If TLM has been referenced somewhere in the trilogy (I really don't remember right now), we can def. think about working on TLMW later. But if PPW doesn't work, I think the other choice is another wiki I just found (added to the top part): Pinocchio, I remember Meggie commenting on it about how sad it was lol.-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 19:33, May 14, 2015 (UTC)


 * Okay, well that makes sense. I don't remember Tink in Inkheart but it has been awhile. So if you think it's going to work out we'll stick with PPW. Katherine Rebekah (talk) 22:45, May 14, 2015 (UTC)


 * Tink was read out by Meggie; in the film her role was replaced by Toto. I assume it's to avoid copyright issue since Disney's version is more recognizable, and the fact it'll just be cheaper to have a dog than to animate a little fairy. Other stuff Meggie read out was the Tin Soldier (I'm not sure which one was read out first) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Steadfast_Tin_Soldier, also an Anderson's story.-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 00:12, May 15, 2015 (UTC)

Now that PPW seems to be in fairly good hands (honestly didn't see THAT coming ahaha), even though TLM doesn't seem to have connections with Inkheart, since you are interested in the tale, would you like to start shape it the way we did with PPW? Towards something like http://aladdin.wikia.com/wiki/Aladdin_Wiki, cuz Disney also did have TLM tv series (I actually watched and liked it back in the days xDD)

I know you said you already have a lot to deal with with this wiki and others, but it's just an idea... cuz lmao... my biggest grand scheme of things (in reality it's just my fantasy HAHA) is to concur all the fairy tale wikis. Crazy, I know xP. I mean, I'm not sure if I've said it somewhere, but I did at one point think about creating a database type wiki about all fairytales and listing general info about ALL their adaptations; that was before I became an admin here lol. So now I think since there's already all those really-lack-of-content wikis lying around, that's the way to do it and the database thingy comes last (years later, again lmao) to form an alliance with them =] -- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 22:15, June 5, 2015 (UTC)


 * Sure, just, like you said, don't count on me for anything, but I'll do what I can. Katherine Rebekah (talk) 14:47, June 6, 2015 (UTC)


 * OMG KR! No wonder the TLMW I found was so unbelievably bad! Because there's actually a considerably more decent one around! http://littlemermaid.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page I just saw it when I was on wikia's home page! So random! I have to say though, although it has 100+ pages... A lot of them seems to be completely empty... idk, I think taking-over wise (lmao), the other one is obviously a lot more easier, but this one has more stuff already there to be worked with; if that makes any sense; I think "the perfect plan" is to work on the other one; make it prettier in general, gain admin access, import usable pages from this one; and then request to be merged lmao, cuz honestly, the other one has a better link imo. Forget about what I just wrote, this one is also relatively inactive, and I checked, it is in fact up for adoption, so if interested, work with this one first, and then post a public statement about adoption and file for one (I'm pretty sure you will get it if you go for it, just like if either of us go for the PPW, we can def. get it, just that we don't need to.) When you do get the rights (I said when not if because I'm more than 100% sure it'll be done if it's been filed), write to wikia about merging with another inactive wiki. I mean, they approved my request for the other two Inkheart wikis when I barely started working this one; so I think it can work. It's just a thought, but I figure I should let you know since you were also quite shock how bad the other one was xP At least this one has a tons of images (not sure if they are all needed though o___O) I still think any TLM wiki should have been epic cuz even if its just focusing on the Disney aspect.... it's like come on they have an awesome TV series!-- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 05:48, June 9, 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, that one looks way better. If we do go after one it should be that one. But are you sure that it's not just for Disney? They have nothing about the Hans Christian Anderson version. Katherine Rebekah (talk) 12:37, June 9, 2015 (UTC)


 * I mean I'll be honestly, currently it does look like it only has Disney stuff, however, since there's no admin there anyways, it should be fine if we started adding something else. I mean, even the OUaT wiki have pages on all the original fairytales that were adapted to the show, I think it is fair to first put up info about Hans Christian Anderson and his original version, since that was what Disney's TLM is based on; and the funny thing is I just checked, apparently in the TLMTV series, there's actually a character based on the author xDDD Check out Hans Christian Andersen (character)! So yeah, once those info are added, then we can start on other adaptations, though, like I said... I honestly didn't know TLM has a lot of different versions lol we can worry about that after adding the original materials xDD -- S a m m m ✦✧ (talk) 17:35, June 9, 2015 (UTC)


 * Too true. It is based on the original, so it should be fine. Katherine Rebekah (talk) 18:11, June 9, 2015 (UTC)